"Gyeongnam-do Province said I didn't know," wasting only time to pass on the responsibility, and the damage was to NC, the team, and the fans

This is a direct comment from a source at the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. It clearly shows the nature of the delay in investigating the accident at Changwon NC Park. They wasted time passing the buck to each other. In other words, NC clubs, players and fans took full responsibility for the damage.메이저사이트

On March 29, a sad death accident occurred when the outer wall structure of Changwon NC Park fell. It is an accident that should not happen again. Both the fans and the team mourned deeply.
In accordance with Article 58 of the Special Act on the Safety and Maintenance of Facilities, it was necessary to take emergency measures and form an accident investigation committee for public facility accidents. The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport ordered the Gyeongnam Provincial Office to set up an accident investigation committee, and Changwon City to conduct an emergency safety inspection.

However, the South Gyeongsang provincial government failed to comply with the order, saying, "It is not under our jurisdiction. There is no legal basis."

An official from the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport said in a phone call with Sports Seoul, "We sent the first official letter to the South Gyeongsang Provincial Government on April 3 regarding the composition of the Investigation Committee, and on the same day, the provincial government received a reply saying there was no legal basis. There were several official letters and responses, but there was no practical action."
The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport convened an emergency meeting on April 11 with the Gyeongnam Provincial Government, Changwon City, and Changwon Facilities Corporation, but Gyeongnam Province was absent due to "response to forest fires." Eventually, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport had no choice but to change its order to Changwon City, saying, "If you don't do it in the province, you should form an investigation committee in the city."

An official from the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport said, "Under Article 58 of the Special Act on the Safety Management of Facilities, the head of the local government can guide and manage or operate the investigation committee if necessary."
South Gyeongsang Province did not admit it. "It is true that we received an official document on the composition of the investigation committee, but there is no legal basis. It is right for Changwon City, a management agency, to set it up. We have no authority to step up," said an official from the Social Disaster Division of the Gyeongnam Provincial Government.

Changwon City responded by asking, "How can you open a investigation committee when you are a person involved in a police investigation?" Eventually, the Gyeongnam Provincial Government took responsibility for the late decision.

"It is true that the South Gyeongsang Provincial Government made the decision late. That is why the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport told us to form a committee again," a Changwon city official said. "We formed it as soon as possible after receiving orders from the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. It is because the provincial government's judgment was delayed."

Eventually, the investigation committee was established by Changwon City about a month after the accident. While the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Gyeongsangnam-do Provincial Government, and Changwon City were "turning the blame," NC was forced to walk on the steep path.

Although the management responsibility for public facility safety is clearly defined, the related agencies have avoided responsibility and only turned their backs on each other under the pretext of interpreting the provisions of the law. The system for public safety is bound to be recorded as a representative case that did not work due to the net of avoiding responsibility.

Accidents can happen again at any time. If 'irresponsible administration' is repeated, it is unknown who will be the next victim. Even then, the probability of someone saying this seems quite high. "There is no legal basis."

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *